We’ve Printed a Monster

Ethics of 3D Bio-printing

3d printing, biology, bio printing, ethics, FDALast week, Industry analyst Gartner expressed a number of potential disruptive innovations from 3D Printing.

One notable entry is the group’s prediction that bio-printing is set to make an ethical impact on the World.

“By 2016, 3D printing of tissues and organs (bio-printing) will cause a global debate about regulating the technology or banning it for both human and nonhuman use.” Specifically, Gartner’s analysts believe that, “The U.S. Food and Drug Administration or comparable agency in a developed nation that is charged with evaluating all medical proposals will introduce guidelines that prohibit the bio-printing of life-saving 3D printed organs and tissues without its prior approval by end of 2015.”

Given that bio-printing technology is advancing at a rapid pace, 3D printed replacement organs could be as close as a decade away.

Although Gartner takes a pessimistic view in their prediction, I wonder if medical lobbies could muster enough support to allow 3D printed organs to become an integral part of the future of medicine. Not only could this technology prolong life, it could possibly eliminate the criminal and black market organ trade.

That sounds like a win-win to me.

Another potential disruptive innovations predicted by Gartner is the concern for IP theft. For more information click here.

Source: Gartner