Digital Foam Elastomers Make Airless Basketball, Sporting Goods

RAPID+TCT 2023: EOS Senior Additive Consultant Dave Krzeminski on digital foam for sporting goods and more.

Digital foam promises to deliver complex internal geometries with elastomers in additive applications that are ideal for sporting goods and other industries. Jim Anderton tries a digital foam basketball that feels and plays like an inflated ball with lower cost and better durability. EOS senior additive manufacturing consultant explains how it works. 

Access all episodes of On The Show Floor on engineering.com TV along with all of our other series.

Show Transcript:

Jim Anderton
You know in additive manufacturing, one of the beauties of the technology is it’s possible to make enclosed structures that have very complex structure inside and part of that complex structure can actually be void space – tactically used void space. I’m with Dave Krzeminski, he’s senior additive manufacturing consultant EOS.

Dave, you’ve developed something called digital foam. Tell me about that how does that relate to this idea of a closed structure with a complex internal structure.

Dave Krzeminski
For sure. So traditional foam we think about it as some material then there’s some gas that’s kind of enclosed in that, so you get a porous material which gives you the light weighting or buoyancy or other features which you’re looking for. And if we think about a 3D printed lattice structure it is essentially that that same structure that same concept just a little more zoomed in.

So, we have cells – the same way that a traditional foam has cells – and then we have beams or struts in the way that you maybe would see walls. And what’s really great is with these beams are struts you can be much more prescriptive or purposeful with where you put that mass where you put that strut for it to perform the function which you’re trying to sort of engineer for.

Jim Anderton
What’s interesting is we think of to conventional fall where you might say engineer a shell and inject a chemical, react chemically react to form. So, we’re looking at a distribution of void spaces because they’re controlling the size of bubbles in a liquid. And in this case, if you can actually plan every individual strut, is this the idea of like a Warren Truss or an entire lattice structure but in three dimensions?

Dave Krzeminski
With computational design software really advancing the way they are and really ladder structures uh growing as well, you can really tune how you want this 3D structure in lattice to look you want it to be very uniform and monolithic or highly variable or even kind of hybrid. So, depending on again the application or the function, you could have you know a different surface level lattice compared to a body lattice or even a certain depth or thickness where you have a lattice you can even gradient that lattice.

Again you kind of be hearing that you can whatever you can design from a software side there’s certainly going to be limitations with how small you can print or how large of a part – just with any kind of additive technology – but really if you can   create that design and process that design with the software that goes with additive solutions, you can print pretty much whatever you can come up with and that complexity is really free, so you’re not you’re not going to pay a penalty necessarily for having a more complex or more customized design.

A great example here would be with this hockey helmet. We have partnered with Bauer hockey to bring their liner concept to life and this is a customized solution so you can actually head scan or take a scan of someone’s head and customize the fit to be more comfortable and then also you could think about you could purposely orient any of the lattice beams or features to be purposeful towards you know any kind of hockey injury or any other purpose which the athlete or the end user would want.

Jim Anderton
That’s interesting concept because so you could have a highly anisotropic kind of part because in many cases in a lot of engineering examples, we’d like we’d like a certain amount of say torsional rigidity, but we still would like some flex in an axial plane.

Is that what we’re talking about here highly anisotropic properties in this shape?

Dave Krzeminski
Yeah, it could be. What I find very interesting is often when you use a traditional foam solution, you’re engineering to maybe the most critical feature or the hardest portion that you’re engineering for and therefore you’re over engineering for other features right?

If you think about a helmet let’s say that there’s a specific impact that happens to the top of the crown that you have to protect against, then you engineer that component for that but then all the other foam and all the other areas is really over engineered, it’s excess weight, it’s maybe kind of necessary.

Whereas with this you can be again strategic with where and how you place what you’re building and as a result, you can have a more lightweight structure, or you can just put that mass however you want. So that gives more control to the engineer, to the designer. I think it opens up the conversation you can have around the part you’re making as opposed to being forced to work within traditional boundaries or guideposts – you can kind of explore those areas and in some ways challenge what the existing design even looks like: does it even need to fit that current CAD shape? Is that feature really designed because of a traditional manufacturing method? How can additive unlock some of that? And in some cases, maybe even print your whole design for you consolidate many parts that you traditionally would make individually.

And so, these are ways in which additive I think can really open the eyes and really push the field in terms of what can be done.

Jim Anderton
Now it’s stronger lighter, safer safety equipment in sporting goods like that helmet, that makes obvious sense for an application like this.

But we’re standing under a basketball hoop for a reason. I understand you have a very interesting demo here of just basically what you can do with this.

Dave Krzeminski
What you see here the Wilson airless prototype basketball hopefully you can see it in the camera. It is see-through with a lattice – and completely airless, which is which is great – and in some ways – what our whole team was able to do with all of our collaborators – in some ways this looks so elegant and simple, that it maybe seems so obvious.

But really there’s an incredible amount of engineering that went into what this structure does, how it’s printed and really again the number one question we get does this bounce? It does you can try Jim, here if you want to.

But Wilson did an incredible job of not just creating a part. This is not a part that just sits on a stand during a trade show is, it’s an experience, right? People can come here, they can shoot, they can dribble, they can dunk; and I think it makes additive manufacturing can be a little scary and overwhelming for some people and I think this is an object, it’s an application where really it opens up the idea of what can be done. But it also it’s comfortable to people to sort of approach it.

I mean everyone’s dribbled a basketball in their life and what’s fun is to watch everybody be their own kind of critic with it right everybody looks at it but everybody, no matter what, they get in their hands they go quiet, little speechless, and they just start smiling, which is pretty incredible to see everybody do that.

Jim Anderton
Sporting goods, an interesting application for a very high-tech process at EOS.

 

* * *

At Rapid + TCT 2023, the air was electric. The excitement of what manufacturing America’s palpable. New technologies, new ways of implementing additive manufacturing – not just for prototyping – but as a true production process were all over this show floor. The future looks very bright for manufacturing in America based on what we have seen here.

Thanks for joining us on the show floor. See you next time.

Today’s episode is brought to you by engineering.com, a globally trusted source for engineering content. Check out this and many other exclusive videos for the engineering professional found only on engineering.com TV today.

Written by

James Anderton

Jim Anderton is the Director of Content for ENGINEERING.com. Mr. Anderton was formerly editor of Canadian Metalworking Magazine and has contributed to a wide range of print and on-line publications, including Design Engineering, Canadian Plastics, Service Station and Garage Management, Autovision, and the National Post. He also brings prior industry experience in quality and part design for a Tier One automotive supplier.