<rss version="2.0" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
    <channel>
        <title>ENGINEERING.com</title>
        <link>http://www.engineering.com</link>
        <managingEditor>support@engineering.com</managingEditor>
        <webMaster>support@engineering.com</webMaster>
<item>
    <author>LH Sardone</author>
    <title>Comment by LH Sardone on '5 new social media secrets that industrial marketers can learn from Brad and Angelina'</title>
    <link>http://www.engineering.com/AdvertiseWithUs/Blog/ID/4356/5-new-social-media-secrets-that-industrial-marketers-can-learn-from-Brad-and-Angelina.aspx#Comments</link>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 18:03:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">f1397696-738c-4295-afcd-943feb885714:2171</guid>
    <description>John,&lt;br /&gt;I hate to disagree, however the &quot;5 ways to......&quot; is so overdone, and in BAD ways, that I make it a point to avoid opening any of those lists.  Have you actually scanned a group post discussion list on Linked In lately?  Every other post is one of these numbered lists, and most are repeats of each other.  I have cut way back on both the frequency of digest emails and how often I actually scan them because of so much of exactly this kind of junk. Why would a serious marketer, especially to engineers, use this tactic? Anything that is actually valuable info is likely to be ignored.  These numbered lists definitely make MY list of top 5 annoyances on social media posting sites. </description>
    <comments>http://www.engineering.com/AdvertiseWithUs/Blog/ID/4356/5-new-social-media-secrets-that-industrial-marketers-can-learn-from-Brad-and-Angelina.aspx#Comments</comments>
</item>    </channel>
</rss>