Flooding at telecommunications hubs during and after Hurricane Sandy in October 2012 resulted in loss of Internet and landline phone services in areas that met the superstorm’s path. Over the long term, massive damage to telephone wiring, computers, and control rooms in the flood zone greatly delayed the reopening of offices, businesses, and manufacturing facilities in the Northeast, according to an analysis byPricewaterhouseCoopers’ (PwC) Risk Assurance practice.
No area would be immune to long-term communications disruptions if it were hit by a major event, says Brian Nagy, a consultant with Walnut Creek, Calif.-based Eclipse Solutions, a company that provides cost-recovery services in the voice and data telecommunications industries. “In a broad-scale disaster (e.g., a 7.8 earthquake impacting across the Los Angeles basin area), cell relay towers, Internet backbone infrastructure, and signal routing sites may be susceptible to loss of power and physical damage that could make social media unavailable,” said Nagy. Disruptions could last potentially through the entire response phase and even for days or weeks into the recovery phase.
He believes that the resistance and resiliency of the physical infrastructure supporting Internet and cellular communications is a crucially important consideration that is being overlooked in disaster planning by organizations. Nagy urges business managers and owners not to count on cell phone service being available after a disaster.
“It is evident that ‘wireless’ systems are misconstrued to be a magical, infrastructure-free system by many,” he said. “We must be careful to always highlight the physical vulnerabilities of the information and communications technology (ICT) infrastructure.”
Organizations need to prepare in advance, says Phil Samson, principal of PwC’s Risk Assurance practice and the firm’s Business Continuity Management service leader. “This preparation begins with developing a fact-based view of your communications connectivity prioritization, often rooted in a deep understanding of how you’ll be impacted when the communications linkage fails,” Samson noted.
Samson said the impact criteria of lost revenue, brand damage, regulatory consequences, and contractual effect make up the foundation of the cost-benefit analysis performed ahead of disaster-plan investments.
He suggests the following options that can help companies remain connected with emergency response organizations and their employees via voice and text until the mass communications network is restored:
1. Satellite phones – This is the most common and expensive approach to maintaining direct voice connectivity. Companies that require voice connectivity will own several of these phones, given to their emergency operations personnel. “Satellite phones can be used for data communications, as well, but you’ll quickly be reminded of the old days of slow dial-up modem performance,” Samson said.
2. Amateur/ham radios – In a crisis, there’s a pretty good chance the ham radio frequencies will be operating. This approach is best used for short communications, as they will need to be relayed by the receiving party to the final message recipient.
3. Two-way radios – The General Mobile Radio Service (GMRS) is designed for short-distance two-way communications.
4. CB radios – During a localized disaster, users should be able to make contact within a 20- or 30-mile radius through these, Samson says.
5. Microwave communications links – If the crisis scenario includes the need to bridge a line-of-sight distance less than 40 miles, microwave communications links are viable. “Most companies that use this option will pre-install microwave communication equipment, using it periodically to ensure operational preparedness,” Samson said.
Samson adds that when the voice communication infrastructure is congested due to overwhelming volume during a crisis, the Department of Homeland Security offers theGovernment Emergency Telecommunications Service (GETS) program. GETS provides priority handling of phone calls placed over the public phone system.
Be prepared for the long haul with any post-disaster communications method, says Brian Crotty, COO ofBroadview Networks, a Rye Brook, N.Y., firm that provides cloud-based IT and communications solutions. “In the case of a natural disaster, businesses need assurance that their phone lines will continue to work,” he said. “However, it is also essential that your communications system is able to sustain operations during prolonged periods of inaccessibility to the primary work location.”
Crotty says that in some cases, there may not be a timeline for the office to reopen, so it is necessary to prepare for managing a workforce that can function remotely for as long as necessary. He notes that a communications system should have a couple of features to ensure post-disaster usability. One is hot desking — the ability to use any phone and have it function exactly like the one in your office. “Your ‘disaster phone system’ should be the same as your normal phone system — with the same phone number and seamless access to important contact information,” he said.
For more stories like this visit Industry Market Trends
Company phone systems also need tools to monitor call volume and flow, says Crotty. Both the volume and urgency of incoming calls will skyrocket after a disaster, as employees will want to know about contingency plans and closures. Customers will call to check in on how things are going. A neighboring resident or business may want to let you know that a main road to and fro one of your plants is flooded.
“Each of these will involve varying levels of urgency, and it’s important to be able to quickly route calls that are true emergencies to the appropriate contact,” Crotty explained. “Call center service tools that monitor call flow and volume can help you nimbly redirect resources based on callers’ need.”
There are some tools that can make landlines and cell phones more dependable and usable during and after a disaster, says John Von Thaden, an executive at Oak Brook, Ill.-basedFederal Signal. Von Thaden is the vice president/general manager for Alerting and Notification Systems, a unit of Federal Signal Safety and Security Group.
“Cellular carriers offer COWS (Cellular on Wheels) to augment and increase cell coverage and capacity during disasters, but voice communications are typically overloaded during and immediately after local disasters,” he said. “It is critical that public safety personnel recognize the limitations of voice communications and the potential for cellular coverage to be hampered if cell towers are damaged. However, the ability to send messages to text and voice devices is still an important communications layer, and systems such as SmartMsg allow for geo-targeted messaging via high-volume telephone and text transmission.”
Von Thaden told ThomasNet News that “using a hosted dialing infrastructure ensures that text messaging can be transmitted, even if there is limited capability for local calling, after a disaster.”
Equipment by Atlanta-based zBoost boosted the signal strength of carrier networks in Haiti following the January 2010 earthquake for better voice and data transmission. This helped those in the country stay connected to the outside world. While zBoost cannot create a cell signal, it can boost signal strength if cell towers are still working following a disaster.
One communication tool that can be used during and after a disaster is Voxox, a free over-the-top (OTT) messaging and communications application. Some say Voxox is a combination of Skype+Google Voice+HighTail+eFax+BabelFish. Voxox users can communicate within the app for free but send messages to users outside the system using traditional SMS (short message service) channels at a low cost.
Voxox has features that can help users (and organizations) remain connected with family, friends, emergency crews, and employees. The auto attendant component of Voxox, called Personal Assistant, will always work even during power outages or downed circuits because it is located in the service’s switch.
Companies may be getting more serious about disaster planning. The annual AT&T Business Continuity Study (released in July 2013) found that IT executives at businesses nationwide have continued to grow and advance their business continuity and disaster recovery plans. Those plans include relying on wireless networks, cloud services, and mobile applications.
Nearly two-thirds (64 percent) of companies include their wireless network capabilities as part of their business continuity plans. About 87 percent of executives indicate that their organizations have business continuity plans in place in case of a disaster or threat. This is a slight increase from results of the 2012 survey (86 percent).
Read part one of this series, What Manufacturers Need to Do About Data Recovery After a Disaster.
Read part two of this series, How Manufacturers Can Preserve the Supply Chain After a Disaster.
Read part three of this series, Social Media Tools for Manufacturers in Times of Disaster.
Read part four of this series, Manufacturers Join Consortiums to Help Each Other After a Disaster.
Read part five of this series, How to Preserve and Recover Documents After a Disaster.
Read part six of this series, Why Preparedness Is Crucial in Disaster Response and Recovery.
Read part seven of this series, Using Trade Associations and Expert Consultants in Disaster Planning and Recovery.
Read part eight of this series, Temporary Building Makers Step In to Get Post-Disaster Operations Going.
This article was originally published on ThomasNet News Industry Market Trends and is reprinted in its entirety with permission from Thomas Industrial Network. For more stories like this please visit Industry Market Trends.