﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>MBA Blog: Book smarts &amp; Street smarts</title>
    <description>Book smarts and Street Smarts -- 
A blog to help engineers understand whether a $100k MBA investment is right for them, or if they would rather, keep the money and learn MBA topics they can use tomorrow</description>
    <link>http://www.engineering.com/Blogs/tabid/3207/BlogId/37/Default.aspx</link>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <webMaster>info@engineering.com</webMaster>
    <pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 00:10:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 00:10:56 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
    <generator>Blog RSS Generator Version 3.4.0.21439</generator>
    <item>
      <title>Are your Business Skills weak?  New April webinars announced for MBA Day Camp</title>
      <description>&lt;div class="entry-content"&gt;
		&lt;div class="entry-body"&gt;
			&lt;p&gt;In
business, what you don't know can hurt you.&amp;nbsp; Whether you are
considering an MBA or just want to sharpen your business skills, MBA
Day Camp can help you succeed.&amp;nbsp; Raise your Business IQ with our new MBA
Day Camp webinars starting April 8th.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Our instructors take the
lessons from top business schools, weed out the unpractical stuff, and
teach you the most relevant MBA concepts in Strategy, Marketing,
Accounting, &amp;amp; Finance.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We are proven - &lt;strong&gt;over 95% of our customers would recommend us to a friend or peer&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Register for our &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Strategy session on April 8th&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt; at: &lt;a href="https://secure.confertel.net/tsregister.asp?program=MBA2010" target="_blank"&gt;https://secure.confertel.net/tsregister.asp?program=MBA2010&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
		&lt;</description>
      <link>http://www.engineering.com/Blogs/tabid/3207/EntryID/544/Default.aspx</link>
      <comments>http://www.engineering.com/Blogs/tabid/3207/EntryID/544/Default.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engineering.com/Default.aspx?tabid=3207&amp;EntryID=544</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 16:39:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.engineering.com/DesktopModules/Blog/Trackback.aspx?id=544</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The New Face of Product Development - You!</title>
      <description>&lt;div class="entry-content"&gt;
		&lt;div class="entry-body"&gt;
			&lt;p&gt;The
promise of crowdsourcing/collaborative design is filled with
frothing-at-the-mouth hype juxtaposed against old world skepticism.&amp;nbsp;
Consider me squarely in the middle of this debate.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Consider
that Nokia, Motorola, etc spent millions of dollars 'listening to their
customers' yet were unable to come to the market first with a
breakthrough device like the iphone (in an industry that is their 100%
focus, no less).&amp;nbsp; It was the design brilliance of an individual mind
that won here (Steve Jobs).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;However, consider Mountain Dew's remarkeable Dewmocracy campaign (&lt;a href="http:///"&gt;http://www.dewmocracymediahub.com&lt;/a&gt;).&amp;nbsp;
Through this effort, Mountain Dew has incredibly outsourced almost the
entire product launch process to its fan base, from concept to design
to marketing tactics.&amp;nbsp; Clearly this is a hom</description>
      <link>http://www.engineering.com/Blogs/tabid/3207/EntryID/542/Default.aspx</link>
      <comments>http://www.engineering.com/Blogs/tabid/3207/EntryID/542/Default.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engineering.com/Default.aspx?tabid=3207&amp;EntryID=542</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 18:23:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.engineering.com/DesktopModules/Blog/Trackback.aspx?id=542</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why jobless recovery?  Too much corporate cash</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;As companies try to buttress their balance sheet, we are witnessing
a healthy, but troublesome after effect: Too much cash on company
balance sheets.&amp;nbsp; &lt;span style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;Excluding utilities and financial institutions&lt;/span&gt;, members of the Standard
&amp;amp; Poor’s 500 Index ended mid last year with a record $648bn in cash and
short-term securities.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Companies
are hoarding cash, even the non-financial ones, having gotten their
handslapped by the credit markets but not (yet) facing redistribution
pressure from shareholders in the form of dividends or buybacks.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm
not in favor of government intervention in the markets, but instead of
bank taxes and rhetoric against bonuses, why not give companies an
incentive to get this cash off their balance sheets?&amp;nbsp; Tax the cash!&amp;nbsp;
Give companies incentives to create jobs with this cash and push them
back into the hiring mentality.&amp;nb</description>
      <link>http://www.engineering.com/Blogs/tabid/3207/EntryID/489/Default.aspx</link>
      <comments>http://www.engineering.com/Blogs/tabid/3207/EntryID/489/Default.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engineering.com/Default.aspx?tabid=3207&amp;EntryID=489</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 19:51:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.engineering.com/DesktopModules/Blog/Trackback.aspx?id=489</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is Lou Dobbs right?</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Most management academics will adamantly defend outsourcing - a
company that can source activities elsewhere for cheaper/better should
do so.&amp;nbsp; Hence the rash of manufacturing, engineering, IT activities
that have been sourced to cheaper labor pools overseas.&amp;nbsp; This is great
for the consumer &amp;amp; the company, but terrible for the middle class
worker.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Consider this: an Executive recently told me that his
manufacturing facility in the US at non-union rates is $15/hr, facility
in Tijuana, MX is $4.50/hr, and facility in China is $1.50/hr.&amp;nbsp; He will
shift more and more of his work to the China location.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But where
does this leave the community?&amp;nbsp; Those jobs will not be replaced and
there are no other jobs to be retrained too -- there is simply nothing
for these people to do.&amp;nbsp; There is a whole class of worker that thrived
in the 80's that is becoming irrelevant now; it seems like we are on an
inevitable march to </description>
      <link>http://www.engineering.com/Blogs/tabid/3207/EntryID/394/Default.aspx</link>
      <comments>http://www.engineering.com/Blogs/tabid/3207/EntryID/394/Default.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engineering.com/Default.aspx?tabid=3207&amp;EntryID=394</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 22:02:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.engineering.com/DesktopModules/Blog/Trackback.aspx?id=394</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Too big to fail" fund backed by private companies -- I like it</title>
      <description>&lt;div class="entry-content"&gt;
		&lt;div class="entry-body"&gt;
			&lt;p&gt;Treasury secretary Geithner endorses Barney Frank's recent proposal to have a fund to bailout &lt;span style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 0);"&gt;'too big to fail firms', funded by companies with over $10B in assets&lt;/span&gt;.&amp;nbsp;
This type of security net for your competitors is an astounding
concept, one that would be ridiculed in other industries (would
Budweiser shed any tears if Miller went out of business?&amp;nbsp; would they
provide any money to prop them up?!)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The beauty of this plan is
that it might actually avoid the other Wall Street dirty word:
regulation.&amp;nbsp; Even with the market meltdown, Wall Street has been
resolutely against the need for more regulation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Well here's your solution.&amp;nbsp; Instead of providing regulation, you create &lt;span style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 0);"&gt;'unemployment insurance</description>
      <link>http://www.engineering.com/Blogs/tabid/3207/EntryID/344/Default.aspx</link>
      <comments>http://www.engineering.com/Blogs/tabid/3207/EntryID/344/Default.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engineering.com/Default.aspx?tabid=3207&amp;EntryID=344</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 20:49:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.engineering.com/DesktopModules/Blog/Trackback.aspx?id=344</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Olympics - What it means in the way of jobs </title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;There are several opinions out there on whether the Olympics are
good/bad for the resident city.&amp;nbsp; Whether you agree with the Games or
not, it is important to see who emerges as winners. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;IT - the Games take an enormous component (6,500+ PCs, 4000+
Printers in Chicago's bid book).&amp;nbsp; In Sydney, 1.3M lines of software
code were needed&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Construction - $1B in venue construction in chicago's bid book&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Raw Materials - 130 tonnes of steel in Sydney&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Tourism - $7B incremental spend in tourism projected by Chicago&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Employment - 315,000 man years of labor w/$11B in spend - Chicago 2016 study&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All in, Chicago is projecting $22.5B in incremental benefit
including.&amp;nbsp; All these arguments are subject to debate - what is
undeniable is that a &lt;span style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 0);"&gt;HUGE AMOUNT OF SPEND&lt;/span&gt; will be occur</description>
      <link>http://www.engineering.com/Blogs/tabid/3207/EntryID/298/Default.aspx</link>
      <comments>http://www.engineering.com/Blogs/tabid/3207/EntryID/298/Default.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engineering.com/Default.aspx?tabid=3207&amp;EntryID=298</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 22:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.engineering.com/DesktopModules/Blog/Trackback.aspx?id=298</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The mini MBA -- the end of the traditional MBA program as we know it?</title>
      <description>&lt;div class="entry-content"&gt;
		&lt;div class="entry-body"&gt;
			&lt;p&gt;As pointed out by Business Week (&lt;span style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;http://bit.ly/nbmWD&lt;/span&gt;),
more and more professionals are turning to 'mini-MBA' offerings to
advance their professional career [not unlike the one our firm offers!].&amp;nbsp; This poses an interesting question
-- are business schools killing the goose that lays the golden egg by
offering this type of program.&amp;nbsp; At $2-$4K, these programs are
substantially less than traditional MBA education ($100K).&amp;nbsp; The
question on the table: does this program represent service of an
untapped market or cannibalization of their core product?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;An
opinion of one: I think this could cannibalize the traditional program
-- if one can use these byte sized programs to land jobs, it could
start a growing trend for short, focused training (&amp;lt;4 weeks) instead
of the traditional, generalis</description>
      <link>http://www.engineering.com/Blogs/tabid/3207/EntryID/270/Default.aspx</link>
      <comments>http://www.engineering.com/Blogs/tabid/3207/EntryID/270/Default.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engineering.com/Default.aspx?tabid=3207&amp;EntryID=270</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 20:37:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.engineering.com/DesktopModules/Blog/Trackback.aspx?id=270</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Jack Welch - Online MBA - Why this maybe different</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Jack Welch recently announced that he would be launching an online
MBA
(http://www.businessweek.com/bschools/content/jun2009/bs20090622_962094.htm).&amp;nbsp;
He claims he will be heavily involved in curriculum development, even
teaching, the managerial principles that made him one of the most
revered executives of all time.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yawn.&amp;nbsp; For Jack Welch's online
MBA to be truly novel, he will need to lean on his sizable corporate
rolodex from a post graduate employment perspective.&amp;nbsp; That is, he must
convince corporate recruiters that a product of his online university,
would be equally (or better) adept at solving problems than traditional
schools.&amp;nbsp; If Welch makes a few calls to GE and ex-GE execs ( Home
Depot, Best Buy, etc), he could influence hiring from his online MBA
graduates and this could become a revolutionary education format, one
that would threaten traditional schools.&amp;nbsp; If not, it will disappear
into the muck of already crowded </description>
      <link>http://www.engineering.com/Blogs/tabid/3207/EntryID/247/Default.aspx</link>
      <comments>http://www.engineering.com/Blogs/tabid/3207/EntryID/247/Default.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engineering.com/Default.aspx?tabid=3207&amp;EntryID=247</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:51:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.engineering.com/DesktopModules/Blog/Trackback.aspx?id=247</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Turnaround &amp; Restructuring -- Get it while its hot</title>
      <description>If looking to switch careers, look no further than turnaround &amp;amp;
restructuring firms -- the practice is in torrid growth now with
practically all companies suffering from recession doldrums and turning
to structural actions.&amp;nbsp; Consultancy Alix partners reportedly has 60+
staffers helping GM with their bankruptcy; Deloitte was under pressure
from the Treasury department to fast track the Chrysler deal.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Advisory firms in this restructuring space (there are plenty) are
getting their moment in the sun.&amp;nbsp; If you are looking to jump to a
growing space, emphasize the cost cutting or value realization points
in your resume, and apply to these firms to ride the wave.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Aveek Guha, MBA Day Camp&lt;br&gt;
Now on the iphone! -- &lt;u&gt;http://itunes.com/apps/mba101&lt;/u&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.engineering.com/Blogs/tabid/3207/EntryID/230/Default.aspx</link>
      <comments>http://www.engineering.com/Blogs/tabid/3207/EntryID/230/Default.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engineering.com/Default.aspx?tabid=3207&amp;EntryID=230</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 23:41:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.engineering.com/DesktopModules/Blog/Trackback.aspx?id=230</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Deglobalization -- The Return to the Known</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;There will likely be a near term deglobalization that will occur due to this financial meltdown. Take JA Solar out of China: last summer, they bought $100M in bonds at the urging of their Lehman bankers. Now, they have written off the entire $100M, and its stock is down 66% since Lehman filed for bankruptcy.&amp;nbsp; The consequence: they will now keep their financial investments and assets at home -- "For the near future, we are quite comfortable with Chinese banks, they are backed by the Chinese government", says their CFO, Anthea Chung. [business week, may 18th]&lt;/p&gt; 
&lt;P&gt;This trend of capital flight back to originating countries will only increase in the near term with firms still staggerring from their US losses.&amp;nbsp; Couple this with the tight US consumer market and foreign geographies look even more pragmatic for investment in funds and talent.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Look to see&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.engineering.com/Blogs/tabid/3207/EntryID/214/Default.aspx</link>
      <comments>http://www.engineering.com/Blogs/tabid/3207/EntryID/214/Default.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engineering.com/Default.aspx?tabid=3207&amp;EntryID=214</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 20:38:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.engineering.com/DesktopModules/Blog/Trackback.aspx?id=214</trackback:ping>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>