Register     Login
Blogs  
Autodesk Blogs

Written by: BurtJordaan
Tuesday, June 10, 2008

The Principles of Special Relativity

Einstein was lead to his special theory of relativity by his believe that there is no way to detect absolute motion. This dictated that the measured speed of light must be the same in all inertial frames of reference. If this was not so, the laws of physics would have been different in inertial frames that move relative to each other.

Inertial frames are uniformly moving coordinate systems, far away from gravitational effects or any other form of influence, where inertia is isotropic, meaning a given force will cause the same acceleration on identical masses in whatever direction the force is applied.

The Aether Abolished

Einstein also argued that if there was a 'rest-frame' for light (the luminiferous aether), we could in principle set up an inertial frame in which light would not propagate in the forward direction at all, e.g., if the frame moves at the speed of light relative to the aether. Einstein was still very young, when he reportedly contemplated if he would still be able to see his own face in a mirror if they were both at rest in such a frame - moving at the speed of light through the aether.

Einstein realized that it is paradoxical to assume the same light ray can actually move with the same speed c (in an absolute Newtonian sense) relative to all inertial frames. This would require that light adapt its "absolute speed" to the frame that measures it. He decided that either time intervals or distance intervals (or both) must change if measured by observers in different inertial frames in relative motion.

This led to the famous and sometimes controversial notion that "moving clocks tick slower than stationary clocks".  The problem is that one cannot really decide which clock is moving and which clock is stationary - at least not if both clocks are strictly inertial...

I'm inviting questions and/or discussion on this problem.

A more complete description can be found on my website: http://www.relativity-4-engineers.com under the tag: What is Relativity?

(I was unsuccessful in generating a hotlink using this editor - my apologies for any inconvenience caused.)

Burt Jordaan

Tags:

5 comments so far...

Re: What is Relativity?

No questions and/or discussion. Just a comment that this was an interesting post and hope to see another one on the same/similar topic.

By Steve L on   Monday, June 16, 2008

Re: What is Relativity?

Thanks, Steve.

The plan is to continue with similar posts, trying to answer the question: "what is relativity" more fully.

Burt

By BurtJordaan on   Tuesday, June 17, 2008

Re: What is Relativity?

Interesting. Good to see this put in non-physicist but still not general public terms. Am now anxiously waiting for further discussion.
Doug

By DougJ on   Wednesday, June 25, 2008

Re: What is Relativity?

Hi Doug, you wrote: "Good to see this put in non-physicist but still not general public terms."

Yep, as engineer I got frustrated by the lack of technical essence in the popular books and also by the overwhelming technicality of the professional books. Relativity 4 Engineers was my solution to the problem.

Regards, Burt Jordaan (www.relativity-4-engineers.com)

By BurtJordaan on   Thursday, June 26, 2008

Re: What is Relativity?

Let me tell you in a non-physicist way. relativity is nothing but the feel that you get like,"When you sit near a pretty woman, even years would go like seconds. And when you are made to sit on a hot stove even for seconds, it may look like years". This is relativity in simple terms and not given by me. Mr. Einstein replied like this to an English reporter when asked.

By Descorpio on   Tuesday, October 14, 2008

Your name:
Title:
Comment:
Security Code
Enter the code shown above in the box below
Add Comment    Cancel  
Register today to get your ENGINEERING.com email account!

ABOUT US INVESTORS PRIVACY POLICY ADVERTISE WITH US CONTACT US FEEDBACK